UPSC CURRENT AFFAIRS – 15th June 2025

Home / UPSC / Current Affairs / IAEA Non-Compliance Resolution Against Iran: Implications for Tehran and Global Security

IAEA Non-Compliance Resolution Against Iran: Implications for Tehran and Global Security

Why in News?

On June 12, 2025, the IAEA Board of Governors passed a non-compliance resolution against Iran, citing its failure to meet obligations under the 1974 Comprehensive Safeguards Agreement (CSA). This marks the first formal declaration of breach—paving the way for potential referral to the U.N. Security Council.

Key Highlights

  • The resolution declares Iran in breach of CSA obligations.
  • 35-member Board vote:
    • In favour: Majority
    • Against: China, Russia, Venezuela
    • Abstentions: 11 countries
  • Israel launched preliminary military strikes on Iranian nuclear sites on June 13, citing security concerns.
  • Iran dismissed the resolution as “political” and announced counter-measures including:
    • A new underground enrichment complex
    • Centrifuge upgrades at Fordow
    • Increased air defence readiness
    • Alleged deployment of drones

2015 JCPOA (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action)

  1. The JCPOA was signed on July 14, 2015, between Iran and the P5+1 countries (U.S., U.K., France, Russia, China, and Germany) along with the European Union.
  2. The main objective of the deal was to limit Iran’s nuclear program and ensure it remained peaceful, in exchange for lifting international sanctions.

Legal and Technical Context

  • Article XII.C of IAEA Statute invoked—previously used against Iraq (1991), Libya (2004), Syria (2011), etc.
  • Under this, IAEA can:
    • Recommend remedial actions
    • Suspend technical cooperation
    • Report to U.N. Security Council
  • Iran is accused of withholding explanations for enriched uranium traces at Lavisan-Shian, Varamin, Turquzabad.

Safeguards Breaches

Iran failed to:

  • Declare nuclear materials and facilities as required.
  • Permit routine and ad hoc inspections.
  • Maintain surveillance systems at declared sites.

The IAEA said it cannot verify that nuclear material has not been diverted for weapons use.

Next Steps

  • Iran was given a “reasonable” window to respond.
  • If unsatisfactory, Board may escalate issue to U.N. Security Council, which could:
    • Demand compliance
    • Impose or restore sanctions (especially after October 18, 2025, when 2015 deal waivers expire)

A follow-up report expected in September 2025

Geopolitical Implications

  • Israel’s pre-emptive strike raises fears of wider regional conflict.
  • U.S. backs special inspections; Russia and China may oppose escalation.
  • IAEA chief Grossi has offered technical dialogue but remains cautious.

Significance

  • Highlights the erosion of the 2015 JCPOA nuclear deal.
  • Reflects growing distrust between Iran and the international community.
  • Tests the credibility and enforcement capacity of multilateral nuclear governance.

Way Forward

  • Diplomacy via back-channel talks (e.g., Oman) must be revived to prevent escalation.
  • A balanced approach is essential: upholding non-proliferation norms while avoiding armed confrontation.
  • India and other neutral states can play a constructive mediating role in de-escalation.

Economic Implications

For Indian Exporters

  • These reforms reduce transaction costs and compliance hurdles
  • Encourage a more competitive and efficient export environment
  • Promote value addition in key sectors like leather

For Tamil Nadu

  • The reforms particularly benefit the state’s leather industry, a major contributor to employment and exports
  • Boost the marketability of GI-tagged E.I. leather, enhancing rural and traditional industries

For Trade Policy

  • These decisions indicate a shift from regulatory controls to policy facilitation

Reinforce the goals of Make in India, Atmanirbhar Bharat, and India’s ambition to become a leading export power

Recently, BVR Subrahmanyam, CEO of NITI Aayog, claimed that India has overtaken Japan to become the fourth-largest economy in the world, citing data from the International Monetary Fund (IMF). 

India’s rank as the world’s largest economy varies by measure—nominal GDP or purchasing power parity (PPP)—each with key implications for economic analysis.

Significance and Applications

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Call Us Now !

Copyright © JICE ACADEMY FOR EXCELLENCE PRIVATE LIMITED